Course Content
Kirchhoff’s current law
The holy grail of network theory is right here, so lets get started into the world of electronics.
0/3
Kirchhoff’s voltage law
This is a very nice follow up to see what other work Kirchhoff did to help you solve electric networks.
0/2
Ohm’s law
Most of you will have learned this in high school. I think this is the most known formula in electronics, and we cover it here.
0/2
Node voltage analysis
This is where is real hard work start. Node voltage analysis allows us to use KCL to solve complex circuits.
0/4
Mesh current analysis
So we solved complex circuits with KCL and node voltage analysis. We can do the same with KVL only this time it is called the mesh current analysis.
0/2
Super position
Not one but two, three, four, a thousand sources in your circuit. No problem, we can solve this with superposition (although a thousand is still a lot of work).
0/2
Thévenin equivalence
Thévenin is all about simplifying circuits. We can use this to reduce parts of circuits to a single voltage source with a resistor.
0/1
Norton equivalence
No only Thévenin has an equivalence circuit, so does Norton.
0/1
Dependent sources
You can hate these, but you'll get to love these, the dependent sources. They are our vital building blocks for the most awesome electronic component, the mighty transistor! This is also the final part we will master during this course.
0/1
Network theory

Dependent voltage sources

The final circuit component that we are going to learn in this course are the dependent sources.
A dependent voltage source has four variants:

  1. A voltage controlled voltage source
  2. A current controlled voltage source
  3. A voltage controlled current source
  4. A current controlled current source

The four variant are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1. The four variants of the dependent source

The four diamond shaped symbols are the dependent sources. The diamond shape differentiates them from non-dependent (circular shaped) sources. However, if you remember, the voltage sources have the lines connected through (as a short circuit) and the current sources have them draw as a interrupted line (open circuit).
With dependent sources it is exactly the same. The top two symbols in Figure 1 are those for the dependent voltage sources, the bottom two are for the dependent current sources.
Another thing to pay attention to is the value of the sources. This can be a current in the circuit to create a current controlled source, or a voltage for a voltage controlled source.
The current and voltage must always be stated somewhere in the circuit. In Figure 1 the voltage and current are defined at the resistor $$R_1$$.

In circuit analysis

To check what happens when we encounter a controlled source in a circuit we will start with the analysis of a fairly easy circuit.

Dependent voltage source example.
Figure 2. A simple circuit with a dependent source.

In Figure 2 we have a circuit with a dependent voltage source, where the voltage of $$V_2$$ is controlled by the voltage across $$R_1$$. We would like to find out what the voltage across $$R_2$$ is.
This example can be solved with Ohm’s law, as the circuit has two independent parallel branches.
For $$R_1$$ the voltage is known immediately as the resistor is in parallel with the voltage source $$V_1$$, thus $$V_{R_1} = V_1 = 12V$$.

With this we can assign the value for $$V_2$$, this is $$0.5 \cdot V_{R_1} = 6V$$.
And finally we can calculate the voltage across $$R_2$$, which is:

$$V_1 = V_{R_2} + V_2$$

$$12 = V_{R_2} + 6$$

$$V_{R_2} = 6V$$

Dependent sources with mesh current analysis

Example circuit for mesh current analysis with voltage controlled source.
Figure 3. Voltage controlled circuit with dependancy.

In Figure 3 a circuit is depicted where the voltage of the controlled source $$V_2$$ is depending on the voltage across an element in series with the source.
To solve such a circuit we will use either node voltage, or mesh current analysis to solve the entire circuit in one go. Here we will use mesh current, as we will only have to deal with a single mesh.

Same example circuit, but with a mesh current added.
Figure 4. Added the mesh into the circuit.

In Figure 4 we have added the mesh current and the equation can be written:
$$V_1 + V_{R_1} + 0.2 V_{R_1} = 0$$

$$1.2 V_{R_1} = 8$$

$$V_{R_1} = 6 \dfrac{2}{3}V$$

I hope you noticed that while it might look complex at first, there is not much to worry about when using these components. Just keep applying the normal steps to solve a circuit.
Now we ramp it up one notch.

Dependent sources in complex circuits

A more complex circuit demonstrating dependent sources.
Figure 5. More challenge more fun

With the circuit of Figure 5 things really start to kick off.  We now have two sources, one of which is controlled and two nodes, or three loops. Let’s save ourselves some work and solve this circuit using node-voltage analysis.

Node voltage analysis with dependent sources
Figure 6. Named nodes for node-voltage analysis

In Figure 6 we have named the nodes and can write down the equations. Node A can be done as we are used to:

$$-1m + \dfrac{V_A-V_B}{R_1}+\dfrac{V_A-0}{R_2} = 0$$

For the next node we start of with first putting in the dependent current source, as if it is a normal current source formula:

$$ \dfrac{V_B-V_A}{R_1} + \dfrac{V_B-0}{R_3} – 2I_{R_2} = 0$$

Because we know the dependent current source has a current with a value of $$2I_{R_2}$$ we just write it down.
The next step is to check if we can come up with a equation for I_{R_2}. Luckly we can do this, but we have to pay attention to the direction of the current.
For $$I_{R_2}$$ we get: $$I_{R_2} = \dfrac{V_A-0}{R_2}$$

We can substitute this last part into our original node-voltage equation:

$$ \dfrac{V_B-V_A}{R_1} + \dfrac{V_B-0}{R_3} – 2\dfrac{V_A-0}{R_2} = 0$$

Now we can combine everything and put it into a matrix:

\begin{gather}
\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{1}{R_1} + \dfrac{1}{R_2}  & \dfrac{-1}{R_1} \\
\dfrac{-1}{R_1} +  \dfrac{-2}{R_2} & \dfrac{1}{R_1} + \dfrac{1}{R_3} \\ \end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
V_A \\
V_B \end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
1m \\
0 \\ \end{bmatrix}
\end{gather}

\begin{gather}
\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{5}{3k}  & \dfrac{-1}{1.5k} \\
\dfrac{-8}{3k} & \dfrac{37}{33k} \\ \end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
V_A \\
V_B \end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
1m \\
0 \\ \end{bmatrix}
\end{gather}

Putting this in the solver gives us:
$$V_A = 12.33V$$
$$V_B = 29.33V$$

And that is how we can use dependent sources in more difficult circuits.
In the end this only adds one extra step in solving a circuit, so I hope you are not overwhelmed.

 

Dependent sources in Thévenin circuits

Ok this part will be hard. Don’t panic if you don’t get this part, as it will require some abstract thinking, which might take a while to form.